After the outcomes from this week’s Presidential election shocked Democrats throughout the nation, following months of being advised by disingenuous polls that Kamala was main or neck-and-neck with President Trump in every of the swing states, some have begun to name for audits and investigations. The proverbial shoe is now on the opposite foot.
Whereas Kamala has conceded defeat to President Trump and Democrat politicians have remained comparatively silent in these calls, constituents have had a distinct sentiment and have taken to social media to insist one thing is amiss.
Fortunately, Elon Musk’s X platform, previously Twitter, not censors individuals for questioning elections like they did within the lead up to- and following the 2020 Presidential election, as YouTube and plenty of different social media entities did, usually on the behest of the federal government, violating the First Modification.
However what precisely are they calling for? These democrat supporters are taking part in from behind after years of denying overwhelming proof of improprieties within the 2020 and 2022 elections.
Following the 2020 election, investigators started to gather knowledge and proof by means of open data request, together with chain-of-custody (or most often the shortage of), solid vote data, system log information, poll photos, voter rolls, grassroots door-to-door canvassing efforts, and every other piece of information they might get their arms on.
By means of these acquisitions, many grassroots election teams printed quite a few experiences on the anomalies and improprieties within the conducting of these two elections. Maybe essentially the most egregious was the admission from former Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections member Mark Wingate in the course of the disbarment listening to of former Deputy US Lawyer Normal Jeff Clark. Wingate testified, beneath oath, that Fulton County did no signature verification on returns within the largest county in Georgia. He additionally testified that he was denied chain of custody paperwork to help with certifying the validity of the election.
A detailed second could be the proof introduced in Kari Lake’s 2022 lawsuit that exposed a whole lot of hundreds of signatures impossibly verified in beneath 3 seconds, particularly contemplating this required scrolling down on a pc display screen to carry out the verification.
THERE IT IS.
Testimony immediately, beneath oath, from Fulton County Registrations and Elections Board Member Mark Wingate.
Fani Willis now KNOWS that NO signature verification was carried out in Fulton. That 147,000 ballots that, BY LAW, are invalid.
This affect NOT JUST THE… pic.twitter.com/4J8KwAVi8V
— CannCon (@CannConActual) April 2, 2024
In 2024, nonetheless, the shoe is now on the opposite foot. Kamala supporters are taking to X to name for investigations and/or audits into the 2024 outcomes. And this author helps that absolutely.
One X publish with over a million views states “Trump and Musk and their band of thieves have stolen 20,000,000 Democratic votes. Buckle up, it’s going to get ugly.” The sort of election denialism is a ‘menace to democracy!’ </sarcasm>
It appears they forgot when Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan donated $440,000,000 to elections workplace that went predominantly to Democrat strongholds, particularly within the swing states.
Trump and Musk and their band of thieves have stolen 20,000,000 Democratic votes.
Buckle up, it’s going to get ugly.
— Kevan Younger (@KevanYoung2) November 8, 2024
One other publish on X from Pam Keith, an legal professional and the CEO of the Heart for Employment Justice, asks, “Is it attainable that the machines have been hacked to change the tallies from Harris to Trump? As a result of that might make precise sense.” The publish at present has 1.5 million views on X. She has turned off feedback on her publish after being known as an “election fraud insurrectionist”, amongst different issues.
Keith was a Democrat congressional candidate who misplaced by virtually 15 factors to Republican Congressman Brian Mast in Florida’s 18th District.
Is it attainable that the machines have been hacked to change the tallies from Harris to Trump?
As a result of that might make precise sense.
— Pam Keith, Esq. (@PamKeithFL) November 8, 2024
Others have been extra reserved of their remarks, stopping simply wanting calling for audits/investigations. One X consumer writes “So, she raised a billion {dollars}, packed stadiums, document variety of early voters, however 15 million of us sat this one out. Okay.” That publish at present has 6.2 million views.
The reasons for this one are fairly easy. The “billion {dollars}” will doubtless be confirmed to be funds laundered by means of smurfing through ActBlue as soon as a Home investigation is accomplished. The ‘packed [arenas and gymnasiums]’ initially consisted of busloads of out of towners, adopted by celeb visitor performances, resembling Meghan Thee Stallion, Bon Jovi, Bruce Springsteen, and the promise of a Beyoncé efficiency (she by no means took the stage to sing). Donald Trump didn’t use musicians to fill his arenas.
So, she raised a billion {dollars}, packed stadiums, document variety of early voters, however 15 million of us sat this one out. Okay.
— Derek (@DerekNeverFails) November 8, 2024
As The Gateway Pundit reported earlier, there’s positively one thing unusual concerning the vote totals. On this previous election, Kamala Harris acquired 13 million fewer votes than Joe Biden did within the 2020 election. However the anomaly isn’t the 2024 outcomes. It’s 2020’s.
In 2020, Joe Biden acquired ’81 actual, lawful American votes,’ if you’re to consider that. Donald Trump shattered data for an incumbent president and acquired 74 million. However the 2020 numbers are anomalous to 2012, 2016, and 2024, which all align fairly constant in response to a chart posted by ZeroHedge on X.
Sorry to beat a useless horse, however can we return to what occurred right here? pic.twitter.com/FkScNHivuU
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) November 6, 2024
Two different X posts every receiving 446,000 views and 194,000 views known as for Kamala to “not concede the race till a radical recount is completed” as a result of “one thing doesn’t add up.” They write, “Somebody please examine this earlier than Trump takes workplace.” The opposite publish asks, “Who else desires to see a forensic evaluation, an investigation, and a hand recount of this 12 months’s election outcomes? As a result of he cheated.”
Kamala mustn’t concede the race till a radical recount is completed. One thing doesn’t add up. Trump mentioned he didn’t want extra votes. He knew he was going to win. Somebody please examine this earlier than Trump takes workplace.
— LaVaque Audio ️ (@LaVaqueAudio) November 6, 2024
Who else desires to see a forensic evaluation, an investigation, and a hand recount of this 12 months’s election outcomes?
As a result of he cheated.
— Jeras Ikehorn (@JerasIkehorn) November 8, 2024
Maybe to the shock of the customers who made the posts, many of the feedback are both agreeing with the requires an audit/investigation or mentioning the hypocrisy after 4 years of being known as “election deniers” and listening to Mockingbird Media regurgitating the untimely remarks of environmental lawyer-turned-CISA Director, Chris Krebs, who said days after the election that 2020 was “essentially the most safe in American historical past.”
Both means, you’d be hard-pressed to search out anybody within the MAGA/America First motion, particularly these deeply vested in election integrity, resembling myself, who would object to a thorough and absolutely clear audit of the whole lot of elections, particularly in swing states. In any case, how doubtless is it that Democrat Senators outperformed the highest of the ticket Democrat, Kamala Harris, whereas Republican Senatorial candidates grossly underperformed Donald Trump?
Cautious what you want for. You’re beginning to sound like ‘conspiracy theorists.’