What does “transphobia” even imply in 2025?
Is it “transphobic” to insist that there are immutable variations between women and men?
Is it “transphobic” to counsel that these immutable variations can result in dangerous situations when women and men compete in sports activities?
Or is it “transphobic” to easily be a follower of Christ who is aware of that God doesn’t make errors?
In case you’re flaming leftist, you most likely nodded alongside in settlement to every of these questions.
In case you’re a standard, on a regular basis individual — like Jennifer Sey, the founder of ladies’s sportswear firm XX-XY Athletics — you’re most likely additionally nodding alongside. However not in settlement.
You’re nodding alongside since you simply don’t care about what the left slings at you anymore.
Sey hammered that time dwelling whereas chatting with Fox News after she was derided as “transphobic” by a — shock, shock — left-leaning publication.
The San Francisco Chronicle gave “cultural critic” Soleil Ho an open discussion board, and the columnist responded with this drivel masquerading as a headline: “Is that this the subsequent MAGA hat? Transphobic attire is the brand new hotness.”
The article in query was the same old slanted nonsense from Alphabet Mafia activists, with strains like “I can’t assist however have a look at this complete case as a tragic, empty spectacle that demeans us all.”
(Oh, brother. Cry me a river.)
Ho’s primary problem with Sey: “Jennifer Sey, a longtime San Franciscan and former Levi’s government, has been fairly vocal in regards to the Riverside case — and he or she occurs to personal an organization whose sole objective is to pump out anti-trans activewear and fund right-wing influencers.”
The “Riverside” case entails households of younger ladies suing after a transgender athlete competed towards them.
Sey — a former U.S. gymnast — responded to Ho with a wholesome heaping of reality.
Right here’s what out-of-touch-with-reality “progressives” don’t get. Writing stuff like this sells extra t-shirts.
Cancelling doesn’t work anymore.
Calling me a bigot and trans-phobe holds no energy within the tradition anymore.
Your previous methods don’t work. Nobody cares. pic.twitter.com/5ZlHgyyo7v
— Jennifer Sey (@JenniferSey) January 4, 2025
“Right here’s what out-of-touch-with-reality “progressives” don’t get. Writing stuff like this sells extra t-shirts,” Sey posted to X on Jan. 4.
“Cancelling doesn’t work anymore,” Sey continued. “Calling me a bigot and trans-phobe holds no energy within the tradition anymore.
“Your previous methods don’t work,” she added. “Nobody cares.”
And make no mistake about it, Sey’s conviction is actual.
“I used to be impressed to start out XX-XY Athletics as a result of I seemed round at the entire athletic manufacturers on the market claiming to champion feminine athletes and ignoring this problem that’s proper in entrance of us, which is increasingly males coming into ladies’s sports activities,” Sey instructed Fox. “Not solely ignoring it, however I’d argue, in lots of situations, standing on the wrong side of the issue.”
Sey famous that the Chronicle has lengthy had a difficulty along with her: “The San Francisco Chronicle likes to troll me a bit. They don’t like that I’m so vital of town and their establishments and their governance. That stated, I’ll take it, you realize, if XX-XY athletics is the ‘new hotness,’ that sounds prefer it’s fairly on-trend to me.”
Oh, and as for Sey’s direct tackle of Ho’s article?
“The article total is … I don’t have one other phrase for it aside from ‘silly’ and ‘full of lies,’” she instructed Fox. “The author makes the assertion that huge numbers of research present that intercourse is a spectrum.”
“That’s simply false. There are not any research. She cites no research. She hyperlinks to no research,” Sey continued. “There isn’t a proof that intercourse is a spectrum. Intercourse is binary.”
“I don’t understand how a newspaper cannot even reality verify. I do know it’s an op-ed, however you realize, fundamental info shouldn’t be violated, I believe, in an precise newspaper.”
And that is the place this author should respectfully — however strongly — disagree with Sey.
The San Francisco just isn’t “an precise newspaper.” It’s extra of a leftist rag stuffed with socialist indoctrination. In reality, papers just like the Chronicle are a dying breed, and for good purpose.
It’s presupposed to be a “information” paper, not “leftist propaganda” paper, however it might not matter in the long term.
And that’s as a result of Sey’s response to the Chronicle was the right distillation of how Individuals really feel in regards to the institution media and its shadowy tendrils.
To paraphrase King Théoden, “You leftists don’t have any energy right here.”
Good.
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.