Supreme Courtroom Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson has mentioned she is getting ready herself to rule on the result of a disputed presidential election.
In an interview with CBS’s Norah O’Donnell, Jackson mentioned the court docket should be ready for such an end result.
“I feel there are authorized points that come up out of the political course of,” Jackson mentioned throughout an interview with CBS’s Norah O’Donnell. “And so, the Supreme Courtroom needs to be ready to reply — if — if that ought to be mandatory.”
O’Donnell then requested Jackson level clean whether or not she was personally ready for a Supreme Courtroom ruling.
“As ready as anybody may be,” Jackson responded. “Let me ask you, are you ready for all the information cycles that you simply’re getting because of this election?”
“Um, no,” O’Donnell responded.
Jackson was additionally requested to weigh in on her current dissent in opposition to a court docket ruling that gave Donald Trump immunity for official acts he undertook as president, in what was undoubtedly a serious authorized victory for the previous president.
“I used to be involved a few system that appeared to supply immunity for one particular person below one set of circumstances, when we have now a legal justice system that had ordinarily handled everybody the identical,” Jackson defined.
EXCLUSIVE We sit down for a history-making interview with Supreme Courtroom Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. In her first interview since becoming a member of the nation’s highest court docket, we converse to Justice Jackson about her private journey to the bench, presidential immunity, an enforceable… pic.twitter.com/daZcu8Ps3b
— Norah O’Donnell (@NorahODonnell) August 27, 2024
Whereas one can by no means say for certain how a Supreme Courtroom justice will vote on a sure difficulty, Jackson’s loyalty to the Biden regime and her position on the leftist wing of the court docket means she can be prone to aspect with the Harris marketing campaign in any electoral dispute.
Following the 2020 presidential election, wherein the Democratic Get together engaged in large, widespread voter fraud, the Supreme Courtroom declined to listen to the overwhelming proof that will have given Donald Trump a second time period in workplace.