EXCLUSIVE: Woman Suing Rudy Giuliani For Sexual Harassment Was Previously Sued for RACKETEERING and Extorting “High Net Worth Men” – BUSTED! | The Gateway Pundit

The girl at present suing Rudy Giuliani for sexual harassment has been sued up to now by one other man for extortion and racketeering. 

The Gateway Pundit unearthed a lawsuit courting again to 2016 the place actual property mogul Steve Kogut accused Noelle Dunphy (the girl suing Giuliani) of main a racketeering ring. He alleged the ring targets “Excessive Internet Price Males” and extorts them for money by utilizing legislation fare and false sexual allegations as blackmail. Within the lawsuit, Kogut stated Dunphy accused him of rape and sexual harassment to extort him for money.

The pretend information didn’t report on the racketeering lawsuit when this exact same lady got here out with comparable allegations towards Rudy Giuliani final 12 months.

In keeping with the lawsuit:

“Plaintiff STEVEN KOGUT, by his attorneys DAVID HOROWITZ, P.C. hereby seeks damages for defamation, damages sustained on account of defendants’ (NOELLE DUNPHY’S) ongoing sample of racketeering exercise (RICO), bodily damages because of being bodily assaulted by defendant and bodily accidents as having been given a sexually transmitted illness by the defendant.”

The identical defendant, Noelle Dunphy, is at present suing Rudy Giuliani for hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in a case pending in a Federal Courthouse in Manhattan, New York.

The lawsuit illustrates this isn’t the primary time Giuliani’s accuser made extraordinary claims towards a widely known ex-boyfriend and sued him for a piece of his fortune. Within the lawsuit, Plaintiff Steve Kogut alleged that Dunphy extorted him after they broke off their short-lived romantic relationship. He additionally alleged Dunphy “boasted of her focusing on and extortion scheme and the success she had in blackmailing (Billionaire Michael) Gabelli into paying her 5 Million {Dollars} ($5,000.000.00) by threatening Gabelli with a civil lawsuit.”

Civil Conspiracy to Defraud, (Federal Civil RICO, 18 U.S.C. §1962(c)) and Defamation are among the many “Causes of Motion” talked about within the Kogut lawsuit.

Within the lawsuit Kogut stated ex-girlfriend Dunphy threatened him with a civil lawsuit in a similar way as to Gabelli and now Rudy Giuliani.

See the complete RICO lawsuit filed towards Rudy Giuliani’s accuser:

Final 12 months, the mainstream media gleefully reported that Giuliani was being sued by Dunphy for sexual harassment and listed a number of unsubstantiated allegations in vivid element. Not a single media outlet bothered to do a easy background search or truth test on Dunphy earlier than detailing her extraordinary claims towards Mr. Giuliani and successfully prejudicing the New York jury pool towards him.

Dunphy accused Giuliani of “sexual assault and harassment, wage theft, and different misconduct” in a 70 web page lawsuit that reads extra like a trashy tabloid than an precise authorized doc.

“He made clear that satisfying his sexual calls for – which got here nearly anytime, anyplace – was an absolute requirement of her employment,” the lawsuit states.

Dunphy additionally claims Giuliani compelled her to carry out oral intercourse whereas he was on the cellphone with well-known purchasers as a result of he stated it made him “really feel like Invoice Clinton,” and requested she strip bare on work video calls. Dunphy claims Giuliani owes her $2 million after not paying her for “two years of labor”.

Dunphy additionally alleged, with no proof, that Mr Giuliani and President Trump have been making an attempt to promote presidential pardons for $2 million {dollars} every.

Giuliani “vehemently” denied all of the allegations, and his legal professional stated Dunphy by no means labored for his firm. Relatively, his spokesperson stated they have been in a consensual romantic relationship for a short while interval.

“Sadly, these days there is no such thing as a burden of proof in relation to suing a politically persecuted man like Rudy Giuliani,” stated a reputable supply with inside data of the continuing case. “You may actually say and ask for no matter you need.”

Learn authentic lawsuit Dunphy filed towards Giuliani by clicking HERE.

Inside Version gave Dunphy a platform with an “unique interview” the place she rattled off sexual allegations towards Giuliani just like those she made towards Kogut. Interviewer Ann Mercogliano didn’t ask Dunphy about her previous lawsuits and or settlements with millionaires over allegations akin to these she made towards Giuliani.

Does Dunphy appear credible? You be the jury. Try her unique interview with Inside Version final 12 months:

The RICO lawsuit, which has not but been reported by any mainstream media, additionally alleges Dunphy pocketed donations meant for kids with most cancers.

In keeping with the lawsuit filed by Plaintiff Steve Kogut:

Plaintiff’s suspicions proceed to develop when Plaintiff discovered that Defendant (NOELLE DUNPHY) claimed to have based a charity for kids with most cancers: Brilliant Lights Basis for Kids with Most cancers.

Brilliant Lights Basis for Kids with Most cancers was by no means registered as a charitable group or as a nonprofit group with the State of New York or another state. In different phrases, Brilliant Lights Basis for Kids with Most cancers was a ruse created by Defendant for the only objective of lining her personal pockets.

“Upon data and perception, the Defendant obtained contributions by test, money, bank card and PayPal, of all which it’s believed Defendant pocketed.  Not a single dime is believed to have been given to kids affected by most cancers.“

Kogut additional particulars:

Plaintiff grew much more suspicious of the Defendant, when the Defendant started to brag about extorting 5 Million {Dollars} ($5,000,000.00) from Michael Gabelli, (hereinafter “Gabelli”) the son of Mario Gabelli, founder, chairman, and CEO of Gabelli Asset Administration Firm Traders by falsely alleging that Michael Gabelli had raped her. Upon data and perception, the settlement got here in two elements: the primary cost upon execution of the non-disclosure settlement, the second cost to be made in the summertime of 2014.

Defendant informed Plaintiff: that on or about August 8, 2011, Defendant met Gabelli at a Enterprise Monetary Networking Evening; that Defendant and Gabelli exchanged enterprise playing cards and Gabelli mentioned hiring Defendant; that Gabelli emailed Defendant about scheduling an extra assembly to debate hiring Defendant and {that a} additional assembly did certainly happen. Upon data and perception, Defendant had already hatched her plan and scheme to defraud Gabelli.

Defendant informed Plaintiff that on or about August 15, 2011, Defendant together with one other particular person met Gabelli on the SoHo Home Roof Pool Lounge.  Defendant, her confederate and Gabelli met for about quarter-hour.  Defendant and Gabelli left the SoHo Home and went to Defendant’s condo situated at 255 West 14th Road, Condominium 4H, New York, New York. Upon data and perception, Defendant and Gabelli engaged in consensual intercourse. In an effort to extort cash for Gabelli, Defendant fabricated a declare that Gabelli adopted her house from the SoHo Home, raped Defendant, assaulted Defendant by slapping her and threatened to kill Defendant if she known as the police. Defendant boasted of her focusing on and extortion scheme and the success she had in blackmailing Gabelli into paying her 5 Million {Dollars} ($5,000.000.00) by threatening Gabelli with a civil lawsuit. Defendant claimed to be Gabelli’s “worst nightmare in courtroom” as a result of Defendant was Ivy League educated– graduating from Columbia College with a level in inventive writing and was a one time magnificence pageant contestant. In different phrases; the right witness.

Kogut additionally had Dunphy arrested after a police report says she broke into his condo, pocketed his Rolex watch and threatened his daughter. Restaining order for a 12 months.

In keeping with the lawsuit:

“On July 18, 2014, Plaintiff awoke at roughly 7:15 am, left his bed room to go make espresso, solely to search out the Defendant (Noelle Dunphy) within the firm of a male, identified to Plaintiff as Chris Lukas. Defendant was by his desk and file cupboards. Defendant was rummaging via Plaintiff’s private doc; dumping paperwork on his desk. Plaintiff demanded that Mr. Lukas depart his condo. Plaintiff then known as 911. Within the meantime, Defendant threatened Plaintiff’s daughter. Whereas Plaintiff was on the cellphone with the 911 dispatcher, Defendant fled the condo.  The police arrived and the Defendant was positioned underneath arrest and charged with three counts of Assault within the Third Diploma and one rely of Harassment within the Second Diploma. A home incident report memorializing the aforementioned occasions was filed by the New York Metropolis Police Division. Orders of safety have been issued towards the Defendant to chorus from any contact or communication of any sort with Plaintiff and his household.” 

In keeping with the lawsuit, Defendant, NOELLE DUNPHY has a number of aliases: a/ok/a CHRISTINE ASHLEY DUNPHY, a/ok/a ELLE ASHLEY, a/ok/a ANNA MURPHY, a/ok/a NOELLE ASHLEY, a/ok/a NICOLE DOE, a/ok/a NOELLE ASHLEY WHITCHER a/ok/a CHRISTINE WHITCHER. It additionally states that “Defendant is unemployed. Defendant is a self-proclaimed monetary author, masseuse, escort, charity organizer, mannequin, actress, screenwriter, novelist, web innovator and advisor.”

We additionally discovered a buried transcript of a courtroom listening to in Manhattan the place a decide threw one other Dunphy case out of the courtroom and all however known as her a liar. On this explicit case, Dunphy was making an attempt to have a restraining order prolonged towards Steve Kogut.

This one is a MUST READ straight out of Choose Judy’s courtroom.

The Choose’s last phrases relating to Noelle Dunphy on this case:

“I’ve heard the testimony of every celebration on this case. With respect to the petitioner (Noelle Dunphy), I’ve noticed her demeanor and the way through which she testified. I listened to her testimony. I didn’t actually hear any actual particulars in her testimony. They have been primarily conclusory statements. She used the time period “rape,” however I had no description of what that was…

…when it got here to cross-examination, she was extraordinarily evasive and she or he didn’t reply the questions. As I stated, it was disjointed testimony, it lacked specificity, and it was extraordinarily incredulous at factors. There was one level the place she put her head down together with her palms over her face and was shifting her physique as if she was crying, however, when she put her palms down there have been completely no tears. She had dry eyes. She was completely superb immediately and again to her prior demeanor. I discovered that to be very unusual and likewise indicating that these have been pretend tears and nothing actually occurring there.

Her demeanor and her method in testifying was simply not credible. I watched her very rigorously and I studied her very rigorously. Even after I requested her questions, she couldn’t give a straight reply. I used to be shocked by the truth that she is a Columbia College graduate–I consider she stated her main was Artistic Writing–and she or he was not in a position to perceive a easy query. There was no rocket science occurring right here. They have been fundamental questions and she or he was in all places. To me, that made her appear extraordinarily unimaginable. She was simply not plausible. It simply didn’t make sense. Alternatively, when the respondent (Steve Kogut) testified, he was very clear. He answered questions in a direct method. He defined himself and the rationale with respect to actions that have been taken. His testimony did have a hoop of fact. I noticed his demeanor when he testified. He seemed to be very forthcoming with respect to his responses and the way through which he carried out himself in the course of the course of his testimony. I’ve the other view with respect to the petitioner’s (Noelle Dunphy’s) testimony. Having discovered her not credible, not plausible, and–I’d agree with the summation–fantastical within the method through which she testified, the petition is dismissed. I’m not in a position to make a discovering having discovered that the petitioner simply lacks credibility. The momentary order of safety can be dismissed and vacated.”

Do you suppose Rudy Giuliani can have a good decide and jury in his upcoming trial with Dunphy? Remark under!