Visitor publish by Erin Clements and printed at JoeHoft.com – republished with permission.
Reality is Treason in an Empire of Lies
President Trump stated, “Does anybody discover that the election-rigging Biden administration by no means goes after the riggers, however solely after those who need to catch and expose the rigging canine?”
One of the vital high-profile examples of the federal government’s prosecution of the harmless—is former Mesa County Clerk, Tina Peters.
After Peters’ sentencing final month to 9 years in jail—new info has surfaced displaying that Colorado officers have been working for Dominion and Runbeck, whereas concurrently orchestrating Peters’ reputational and authorized downfall by way of again channels.
PETERS PROTECTS HER ELECTION RECORDS FROM BEING ERASED BY DOMINION, ANGERING DOMINION AND THEIR CAPTURED PUBLIC OFFICIALS
Following the 2020 election, Tina Peters obtained discover from the Colorado Secretary of State, Jenna Griswold, that Dominion Voting Methods can be visiting her workplace to put in a “trusted construct” on her election system. The “trusted construct” would overwrite the info that was saved on her computer systems. Because the elected County Clerk and Recorder, Peters was the custodian of the election data and had an obligation to protect them for 25 months. So, Peters had a duplicate fabricated from her central election pc to make sure that the data can be preserved previous to the “trusted construct.” She additionally made one other copy of the machine after the “trusted construct.” (https://casetext.com/statute/colorado-revised-statutes/title-1-elections/general-primary-recall-and-congressional-vacancy-elections/article-7-conduct-of-elections/part-8-preservation-of-ballots-and-election-records/section-1-7-802-preservation-of-election-records)
Tina Peters, Former Mesa County Clerk and Recorder, Dominion Whistleblower
When the “earlier than” copy of the unique election information was analyzed by specialists, it was found that the election database had been deleted and overwritten whereas the 2020 election was ongoing. In different phrases, it was just like the Dominion software program was conserving two units of books on the election. The “after” copy of the database confirmed that Dominion had in reality deleted election data from the county’s machines, breaking state and federal regulation. Mesa County District Legal professional, Dan Rubinstein performed a non-technical investigation into the claims made by the specialists and declared the anomalies contained in the Dominion database to be brought on by “human error” – a declare that has since been debunked. (https://tinapeters.us/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mesa-county-forensic-report-no-3-signed.pdf, https://www.kkco11news.com/2022/05/20/district-attorney-investigation-finds-no-evidence-criminal-activity-election-fraud-report/, https://tinapeters.us/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/OFFICIAL-STATEMENT-5-20.pdf)
For the sin of preserving Mesa County’s election data, Peters was charged and convicted of three counts of trying to affect a public servant, conspiracy to commit prison impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of responsibility, and failing to adjust to the secretary of state. The jury acquitted Peters of prison impersonation, conspiracy to commit prison impersonation, and id theft. Peters has filed an attraction for a number of authorized errors made by the courtroom throughout her trial. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1blBUu7S3AF5ndaaqE8t_IBAlzaGT4twX/view)
Nevertheless, newly launched emails between Mesa County officers present that Tina Peters was not solely set as much as fail with respect to answering questions in regards to the 2020 election, however she was set as much as fail the second she set foot within the clerk’s workplace.
TINA PETERS UPSET THE INCESTUOUS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOMINION AND COLORADO COUNTY OFFICIALS
To grasp how gorgeous these new revelations are, it’s essential to know among the political historical past of Mesa County, Colorado.
In 2018, Sheila Riener reached time period limits in her place as Mesa County Clerk and Recorder, so she ran for, and received, the County Treasurer place, taking workplace to start with of 2019. (https://www.mesacounty.us/departments-and-services/treasurer )
Sheila Reiner, former Mesa County Clerk and Recorder, labored for Dominion, Present Treasurer
A lady named Bobbie Gross labored because the Co-Director of Elections below Reiner and was operating to be the following Clerk and Recorder. However Tina Peters, utterly new to politics, unexpectedly threw her hat within the ring to run for the workplace. Peters promised to repair three-hour wait occasions on the Division of Motor Autos, which is run by the Clerk and Recorder’s workplace. Upsetting Gross’s plans, Peters received her election in November of 2018 and was sworn in to workplace in January 2019. Gross left the Clerk and Recorder’s workplace after her defeat and went to work for Reiner within the Treasurer’s Workplace as a “Treasurer’s Technician.”
Bobbie Gross, Former Co-Director of Elections, labored for Dominion, Present Mesa County Clerk and Recorder
Although Reiner and Gross have been now within the Treasurer’s Workplace, Dominion Voting Methods was sending emails to Sheila Reiner all through 2019 with info that will not have been acceptable for her to cope with as she was not the Clerk and Recorder. For instance, within the following e mail change that came about on September 23, 2019, Dominion might be seen speaking instantly with Reiner concerning their Dominion ICX poll marking units. Dominion gave Reiner a monitoring quantity for his or her “product package deal” and provided assist with the pre-election logic and accuracy testing. Once more, presently Tina Peters was the clerk and recorder for Mesa County.
E mail from Dominion to County Treasurer Sheila Reiner
Why would Dominion ship emails to the Mesa County Treasurer?
Regardless that Reiner was not the Clerk and Recorder, investigators have realized she was working for Dominion Voting.
In an e mail change dated October 14, 2019, Dominion despatched an e mail to a neighboring County Clerk and Recorder, Lana Hancock, letting Hancock know that Treasurer Reiner can be her Election Day help from Dominion Voting Methods. Dominion offers Reiner’s official county contact info earlier than Reiner redirects Hancock to make use of her Dominion e mail and telephone quantity. (https://dolocnty.colorado.gov/departments/clerk-and-recorder)
Sheila Reiner was working for Dominion whereas she was the Mesa County Treasurer, and everybody appears to understand it
It’s astonishing that nobody concerned on this change questioned the moral appropriateness of this association.
A couple of month later, Dominion despatched Reiner an e mail inviting her to the “2020 Poll Programming Kickoff.” Tina Peters is clearly absent from the invitation listing, which solely contains Dominion staff and Reiner. Extremely, Reiner obtained the invitation thrice – as soon as to her Mesa County e mail tackle, as soon as to her 2018 marketing campaign e mail tackle, and as soon as to her Dominion Voting Methods e mail tackle.
Sheila Reiner receives emails to her county, marketing campaign, and Dominion e mail addresses about upcoming elections when she had no jurisdiction to be concerned in them because the County Treasurer
The topic of the assembly is odd – “2020 Poll Programming Kickoff.” With the date of the assembly nearly a 12 months out from the 2020 election, it’s nonetheless far too early to know who will probably be operating for the assorted workplaces. Why have been they getting ready so early to program the 2020 ballots?
By regulation, all communications of public officers and authorities staff should be maintained and launched to the general public upon request. Dominion’s selection to speak with Reiner utilizing non-public e mail addresses would have the impact of circumventing Colorado State regulation – permitting them to work together with public officers with out there being any means for the general public to acquire their messages. There’s a clear line of communication with a public official regarding taxpayer funded election companies and all of this was hidden from the general public.
However Dominion didn’t cease with Reiner on their staff whereas she concurrently was a “public servant.” The June 15, 2020, e mail beneath signifies Dominion had prolonged presents to Bobbie Gross, Amanda Polson, and one different individual:
Dominion presents positions to Bobbie Gross and former Mesa County Election Director, Amanda Polson
On the time of this e mail, Bobbie Gross was working below Sheila Reiner within the Mesa County Treasurer’s Workplace. Amanda Polson was the Mesa County Election Director, however give up her job when Tina Peters took workplace. Shortly earlier than this provide from Dominion, Polson was heading an effort to aim to recall Tina Peters, which in the end did not garner the required variety of signatures. (https://www.westernslopenow.com/news/local-news/organizer-behind-clerk-recall-petition-speaks-out/)
Bobbie Gross accepted the place and was assigned by Dominion to help Mineral County through the November 2020 election:
Bobbie Gross was working for Dominion whereas she was a “treasurer technician” within the Mesa County Treasurer’s Workplace
How widespread is that this conflict-of-interest infecting Colorado’s “public servants”? What number of different elected officers, county staff, and former elected officers are working with Dominion and receiving communications from them that bypass Colorado’s public paperwork legal guidelines?
Bobbie Gross was elected to the position of Mesa County Clerk and Recorder when Tina Peter’s time period resulted in 2022. Did she disclose that she had a place with Dominion when she was operating? Can she faithfully perform her duties to the general public who’ve grown to mistrust Dominion? Is Gross nonetheless working for Dominion? (https://time.com/6280840/dominion-fox-news-voting-machines-john-poulos/)
THE COVER UP
In August of 2021, Tina Peters went public with the truth that Dominion had destroyed her election data in opposition to state and federal regulation. Later, it got here out that Dominion software program stored two units of data which have been being overwritten through the 2020 election, for which there isn’t any sincere clarification. As is unfortunately the case with many whistleblowers in corrupt regimes, she obtained a lot persecution for her bother.
Sheila Reiner and Bobbie Gross each assisted within the media pile-on in opposition to whistleblower Peters. At no time did they or the media disclose that they have been additionally working for the very firm Peters was blowing the whistle on. The next quote from Sheila Reiner takes on new that means when it’s understood that Reiner had been colluding with Dominion to undermine Peters’ authority, and bypassing public data legal guidelines: (https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/mesa-county-is-still-reeling-from-election-denying-county-clerk-tina-peters)
“I had been in Mesa County elections for over 20 years at that time, and it was similar to watching somebody destroy our repute. And despite the fact that what she did solely occurred to some gear, your complete course of is now tainted.”
Is she speaking about “our repute” as a Mesa County official? Or is “our repute” referring to her place with Dominion?
Colorado regulation forbids any authorities official or worker from accepting presents “which might are inclined to improperly affect a…individual…from the trustworthy discharge of his public duties, or which an individual … in his place ought to know … is primarily for the aim of rewarding him for official motion he has taken.” Was Dominion undermining the general public’s curiosity by instantly hiring “on the market” authorities officers? (https://www.cml.org/docs/default-source/uploadedfiles/issues/ethics/ethics_conflict_of_interest.pdf?sfvrsn=99be1361_2)
Days after Peters blew the whistle on Dominion, the cover-up conspiracy deepened when the Colorado Secretary of State, Jenna Griswold, appointed Sheila Reiner to run Mesa County’s elections going ahead. This transfer upset the Mesa County Fee who needed to nominate a person named Wayne Williams to the job. In the long run, Sheila Reiner and Wayne Williams determined to share the publish. (https://coloradosun.com/2021/08/17/tina-peters-replaced/, https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/wayne-williams-sheila-reiner-plan-to-share-duties-while-state-county-sort-out-who-can/article_c2ed4c6a-010e-11ec-97ed-2f6b4dd21762.html)
Wayne Williams, Runbeck Senior Advisor, with Shiela Reiner, Mesa County Treasurer and with Dominion
Wayne Williams was, and nonetheless is, Senior Advisor for Runbeck Election Companies – the seller which prints and mails Mesa County’s mail-in-ballots. (https://eoldn.org/leadership/wayne-williams/)
Wayne Williams’s enterprise card, Senior Advisor for Runbeck Election Companies, Employed by Mesa County to run their elections
The legality of both the SOS or the Mesa County Fee unilaterally changing a duly elected county official with a Runbeck worker and a person working for Dominion who had already termed-out of the Mesa County Clerk and Recorder’s workplace is questionable. However Griswold had the help of Biden’s FBI so apparently no questions have been requested. (https://coloradosun.com/2021/08/17/tina-peters-replaced/)
One other of Peters’ critics and staunch supporter of Griswold’s transfer to unilaterally take away her from workplace was the chief of Colorado’s County Clerk’s Affiliation, Matt Crane. It seems Matt Crane’s spouse, Lisa Flannigan-Crane, labored for Dominion for nearly a decade as an in depth colleague of the notorious Dominion Vice President, Eric Coomer – who was overheard earlier than the 2020 election stating – “Don’t fear in regards to the election. Trump isn’t going to win. I made a f***ing certain of that.” (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/caught-matt-crane-critic-tgps-article-obvious-questions-2020-election-results-colorado-not-forthright-turns-wife-worked-dominion-sequoia-d/, https://x.com/Real_RobN/status/1705666054436130898 )
Wayne Williams would go on to invoice Mesa County $31,283 for about six weeks of “work” between mid-August and the top of September 2021, whereas his firm, Runbeck, was additionally profiting off the county.
So as to add to Williams’ look of impropriety, he billed Mesa County for “dinner with Lynn Bartels to enlist help in media issues.” Lynn Bartels is a journalist and former communications director for the Colorado Secretary of State. It’s unknown what sort of “help” she meant to offer Mesa County with “media issues,” however she is sweet mates with one other author named Charles Ashby on the Grand Junction Sentinel, who was one in every of a number of “journalists” in Colorado who ran continuous hit items on Tina Peters. Was Bartels coordinating that effort for Williams and Mesa County?
Excerpt from Wayne Williams’ Bill to Mesa County
The looks of large corruption in Mesa County doesn’t finish there. Inside two weeks of Tina Peters going public with the knowledge that Dominion had illegally erased election data, the Mesa County Fee voted to increase Dominion’s contract by way of 2029 and even invited the CEO of Dominion, John Poulos, to hitch them behind closed doorways for a particular session assembly which was hidden from the general public. The County Fee did nothing to research Peters’ claims about Dominion erasing the County’s election data, however they couldn’t throw her below the bus quick sufficient. Why would the Mesa County Commissioners be so wanting to aspect with Dominion over the pursuits of their very own residents? (http://blog.mesacounty.us/2021/08/commissioners-approve-new-dominion.html)
Mesa County Fee Secret Particular Assembly with Dominion CEO, John Poulos
THE BIDEN REGIME JOINS THE COVER UP
The FBI gave a press release nearly instantly after Peters got here ahead that they have been going to research her for violation of federal legal guidelines. The Biden regime by no means formally prosecuted Tina, but it surely seems Biden’s Division of Justice was holding palms with the native Colorado officers who have been searching for to place Peters in jail. (https://coloradosun.com/2021/08/17/tina-peters-replaced/)
The Mesa County District Legal professional, Dan Rubinstein, included Matthew Kirsh, the USA Legal professional for Colorado in a Might 17, 2022, e mail to a number of District Attorneys throughout Colorado. The e-mail is titled “Rule 3.8 Assembly” which seems to reference the foundations {of professional} conduct for prosecutors. (https://www.justice.gov/usao-co/meet-us-attorney, https://www.cobar.org/Portals/COBAR/Repository/12.1.22/Rule%203.8%20-%20Special%20Responsibilities%20of%20a%20Prosecutor.pdf?ver=h4k_BG_0T1kn7Rdgo8sLiQ%3D%3D )
E mail from Dan Rubinstein to DOJ legal professional and Colorado District Attorneys, apparently brainstorming learn how to seem authentic and moral whereas prosecuting Tina Peters
The e-mail means that Rubinstein was having some bother reconciling the prosecution of Tina Peters with prosecutors’ guidelines {of professional} conduct and needed to name within the calvary to assist him brainstorm methods to keep away from being “accused of wrongdoing.”
Mesa County District Legal professional Dan Rubinstein
First, Rubinstein seems to acknowledge that there isn’t any precedent for the prosecution he desires to undertake, as he expresses a need that this group of authorized minds begin writing opinions and issuing steering paperwork within the vein of the Colorado Bar Affiliation (CBA) and the Colorado District Attorneys’ Council (CDAC). With no coherent authorized pathway for prosecution, it seems Rubinstein inspired this plan of action to offer prosecutors cowl. Second, Rubinstein notes that it’s problematic that they haven’t any formal appointments from a authorities physique to put the groundwork to prosecute Peters. Third, Rubinstein informs the group of their have to anticipate defending themselves as to why they didn’t search an opinion on Peter’s case from the Colorado Bar Affiliation Ethics Fee. Rubinstein and his cronies seem to have succeeded in giving their efforts the veneer of legitimacy as a result of three months after this e mail was despatched, Peters was indicted by a grand jury. (https://www.coloradopolitics.com/courts/tina-peters-arraigned-on-10-felony-misdemeanor-charges-in-case-alleging-election-equipment-breach/article_7ad92362-14ff-11ed-8571-7fe4f678dc82.html)
These authorized gymnastics are harking back to the New York Legislature altering the statute of limitations on intercourse crimes particularly in order that E. Jean Carroll may deliver a civil motion in opposition to President Trump to smear him main as much as the 2024 election. After which there’s the Michigan decide who made a ruling years after the truth that a courtroom order was wanted to entry voting machines, in order that Legal professional Common Dana Nessel may appoint a particular prosecutor to go after a staff of investigators who have been taking a look at a large vote-flip that came about contained in the Dominion voting system in Antrim County, Michigan. (https://www.eglaw.com/blog/new-york-state-law-extends-the-statute-of-limitations-for-sex-crimes/, https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/judge-paves-way-charges-michigan-vote-machine-tampering-probe)
VENDORS OWN COLORADO ELECTIONS AND ELECTION OFFICIALS
With the incestuous preparations Dominion and Runbeck have with county officers in Colorado, it’s no surprise so few Colorado officers have been keen to hitch Tina Peters in demanding accountability. It’s additionally no surprise why Colorado election officers have failed to face as much as Dominion to ask why there are two units of books contained in the machines counting votes and why they routinely erase election data.
Peters was convicted of first-degree official misconduct, violation of responsibility, and id theft. All three of these would appear to extra carefully to use to Sheila Reiner, Bobbie Gross, and Dan Rubinstein. Reiner stored her palms in Mesa County Elections when she had no jurisdiction to take action and with out the data of the individual duly elected to that workplace. Each Reiner and Gross carried on non-public communications with Dominion and acquired themselves positions with Dominion emails. Each ladies at the moment maintain public workplace, but they haven’t disclosed their battle of curiosity with Dominion to the media or the general public. And Dan Rubinstein and his DOJ mates seem to have recognized all alongside that that they had no authorized precedent for prosecuting Tina Peters, however they proceeded with their political witch hunt anyhow.
As unhealthy as all this rampant corruption is, Secretary of State Jena Griswold is the guiltiest of all. In 2022 Griswold despatched 30,000 mailers inviting non-citizens to register to vote. And final month it was found that Griswold posted the passwords to the statewide Dominion election system on the web the place they could possibly be accessed by anybody. When she came upon about it, she eliminated the passwords from the web, reported the incident to the federal Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Safety Company (CISA), however didn’t inform any election officers in Colorado about it, or do something to research or mitigate the potential drawback. Days later after the Republican celebration and media had came upon in regards to the breach, Griswold lied in regards to the extent of the issue and altered a number of passwords on among the affected machines, however by no means halted the continuing election or did any actual investigation to find out if there had been any system breaches because of the uncovered passwords. One particular person from the mainstream media skewered Griswold over this large breach of Colorado’s voting system and identified the hypocrisy of Griswold crucifying Tina Peters whereas mendacity to guard herself. (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/10/lawless-colorado-secretary-state-jena-griswold-sends-30000-voter-registration-notices-noncitizens-english-spanish/, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/10/brutal-colorado-news-anchor-shreds-jena-griswold-live/)
Colorado Secretary of State Jenna Griswold
In 2022, Colorado statutes have been amended to make this very motion dedicated by Griswold a criminal offense punishable by 1 to three years in jail: “Any one that knowingly publishes or causes to be printed passwords or different confidential info regarding a voting system shall instantly have their licensed entry revoked and is responsible of a category 5 felony.” (https://casetext.com/statute/colorado-revised-statutes/title-1-elections/general-primary-recall-and-congressional-vacancy-elections/article-13-election-offenses/part-7-offenses-conduct-of-elections/section-1-13-708-tampering-with-voting-equipment)
If anybody belongs in jail, it’s Griswold and the multitude of Mesa County officers and staff who’ve blurred the traces between “public service” and private enrichment. Tina Peters is the one individual concerned on this ordeal who upheld Colorado’s normal for ethics in authorities:
“The conduct of public officers, members of the final meeting, native authorities officers, and authorities staff should maintain the respect and confidence of the individuals; They shall perform their duties for the advantage of the individuals of the state; They shall, due to this fact, keep away from conduct that’s in violation of their public belief or that creates a justifiable impression amongst members of the general public that such belief is being violated; Any effort to appreciate private monetary acquire by way of public workplace aside from compensation supplied by regulation is a violation of that belief.”
(https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/info_center/laws/COConstitution/ArticleXXIX.html)