The silliest, politically motivated tax policies in Canada

Article content material

Tax and politics are like wine and cheese: they’re inextricably linked and inconceivable to do one with out involving the opposite.

Throughout election instances, this hyperlink turns into slightly apparent. Guarantees right here, guarantees there, with a lot of them being very foolish.

Given the shut hyperlink between the 2 topics, it’s also inevitable that ideologically pushed folks — that’s, most of us — have opinions on tax. Opinions, nevertheless, will not be foolproof and are sometimes unsuitable. People who find themselves robust partisans will typically blindly connect themselves to their political occasion’s views on taxation no matter their appropriateness.

Article content material

For instance, “tax the wealthy” or “it’s not honest that the wealthy have all of the tax breaks” are sometimes rallying cries for these left of centre. Even when you present them how a lot tax the so-called wealthy are paying, they’ll typically preserve trumpeting their rallying cries. It could typically be extra intellectually sincere for such folks to easily say, “We would like the wealthy to pay all the tax.” Loopy, certain, however extra sincere.

One other foolish opinion is that the answer to Canada’s fiscal issues is to “tax all the cash that’s sitting offshore.” For certain, we must always chase pots of gold and rainbows that don’t exist. Nutty, regardless of all of the “research” that sure suppose tanks repeatedly pump out.

Ideally, politics and beliefs needs to be minimized when introducing taxation coverage. With out such minimization, taxation coverage can rapidly grow to be nutty. Listed below are some latest examples, each federally and provincially.

1. The 2016 improve to non-public taxation charges by the Liberals, which promptly launched a brand new top-end bracket with a 4 share level improve upon taking workplace. This pushed marginal charges on the excessive finish to greater than 50 per cent in lots of provinces. There was no sound coverage purpose to take action, nevertheless it was finally all about politics. It didn’t elevate taxation revenues as predicted; it was a revenue loser.

2. The brand new prohibition on deductions for short-term rental house owners who function in a municipality that prohibits such leases. This measure could be very harmful because it places drug sellers and lots of different unlawful enterprise operators on better footing than these evil short-term rental operators (drug sellers et al could be allowed to deduct their enterprise bills for tax functions in the event that they selected to report their revenue … which, after all, many don’t). This measure is all politics. And, frankly, one of many dumbest guidelines in tax legislation.

3. The brand new capital gains inclusion fee improve, which was cloaked round having the so-called wealthy pay just a bit bit extra, coping with intergenerational equity and guaranteeing workers are handled simply as pretty as those that understand capital good points because the latter have a “capital good points benefit.” Ugly politics and a easy tax seize.

Article content material

Article content material

4. British Columbia Premier David Eby recently promised to extend the hypothesis tax on actual property (first launched in 2018) if he will get re-elected throughout this month’s election. This tax is supposedly in place to attempt to flip vacant properties into usable housing. Different municipalities have adopted swimsuit. Ditto with the federal authorities and the ridiculous Underused Housing Tax.

Are these taxes efficient? Uncertain. For instance, the B.C. authorities stated it collected $81 million in 2022 from the tax (which doesn’t account for the executive prices). Minister of Finance Katrine Conroy stated the cash raised was used to construct long-term leases. Yeah, proper. I’d like to go pay a web site go to to these long-term leases. As an alternative, this pittance of revenues is a nuisance and a drag on productiveness.

5. Talking of the B.C. election, the Conservative Celebration of B.C. lately promised to abolish taxes on those that obtain suggestions within the hospitality business. That seems to be following guarantees by the presidential candidates in the US. Frankly, that is foolish. For those who abolish tax on suggestions, how about abolishing tax on different taxable advantages which might be acquired by others exterior the hospitality business? That may solely be honest, proper?

Article content material

6. The Authorities of Canada in 2022 launched the Select Luxury Items Tax Act to cost consumers of sure luxurious vehicles, boats and airplanes a further tax to the extent the value of the merchandise was above sure thresholds. Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, in introducing this new tax within the 2021 federal funds, stated, “It’s additionally honest to ask those that have prospered on this bleak yr to perform a little extra to assist those that nonetheless need assistance. That’s the reason we’re introducing a luxurious tax on new vehicles and personal plane.”

In its first yr of implementation, the federal government raised only $137 million (lower than budgeted) and incurred $19 million to manage the brand new tax. Once more, a pittance and pathetic politics.

7. The proliferation of private tax credit — the kids’s health credit score, arts tax credit score, transit go tax credit score of years previous — are examples of blatant politics. Fortunately, these credit have disappeared, however solely to get replaced by different measures by Justin Trudeau’s authorities, such because the lecturers provide credit score.

The record is nearly limitless, so I may go on and on, however because the well-known playwright George Bernard Shaw as soon as stated, “A authorities that robs Peter to pay Paul can all the time depend on the help of Paul.”

Article content material

Political events and their politicians know this all too nicely. In tax, particularly recently, there are a lot of measures that fall into this class or are merely political pandering. I do know it would by no means be eradicated, however it could be nice if the introduction of straightforward and foolish politics into our tax system was decreased.

Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founding father of Moodys Tax/Moodys Personal Shopper, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Basis, former chair of the Society of Property Practitioners (Canada) and has held many different management positions within the Canadian tax neighborhood. He may be reached at kgcm@kimgcmoody.com and his LinkedIn profile is https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimgcmoody. 

_____________________________________________________________

For those who like this story, join the FP Investor Publication.

_____________________________________________________________

Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s essential to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.

Article content material